Thought experiment: Given that flattening the curve simply postpones infections as opposed to stopping them, should the places with the least current impact be trying to AVOID infections or trying to INCREASE infections to get herd immunity, short of crashing hospitals?
-
-
sweeden does
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Its tempting but clearly you dont live in a rural community. If a small rural community gets sick then they end up.getting life flighted a hundred miles to the nearest ICU. That's why Idahos plan is the better plan. Get the state clean then lock the rest of you out.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Love for someone to explain Mexico and Mexico City in particular? Seems a little more relevant than Sweden or any other European country. Or maybe explain why homeless are immune to CCP virus, but not Typhus
pic.twitter.com/DIjvKYluoy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.