If you are surprised that a complex prediction model did not accurately predict the future, the problem is on your end. Why did you ever think that was a thing?
-
-
The models predicted 100-200k with perfect social distancing not without.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its rational if you are rich.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rational and advisable are two different things. This is where the debate starts. Some would choose to trade tens of billions of US wealth for every life saved. Some wouldn't. I wouldn't. That's not how you run a railroad.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How is it rational to respond to the unknown with such draconian measures? This is exactly what the climate hoax is all about. "We must act now or everyone dies!"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Shouldn't the model be used rationally? It wasn't by the corporate media. I don't think it's reasonable to deny that such irrational and misleading use had an impact on the decisions that were made at the state and federal level.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The models were always wildly inaccurate, but we should make policy decisions based on the wildly inaccurate data."
-
Evading high consequence risk is justified even when the probability of that risk is low or has wide error margins.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
