Funny u say that now. We were told w 100% certainty that such & such would happen if we did not act immediately, & all policy action was based on models. Not only that, we who stood up to "expert modeling consensus" were relentlessly attacked as "deniers." https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1248610181597900803?s=20 …
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Wrong Scott. They never present one model. They present multiple models with various scenarios based on entered data. They are meant to offer decisions makers accurate information to make wise decisions. The models are not meant to persuade but provide guidance.
- Show replies
-
-
-
What if models forecasting economic hardship are demonstrably more reliable at predicting the future accurately than the hospitalization / mortality models that, regardless of accuracy, persuaded us create over-reactive economic hardship? Should we equal weight their utility?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are way off
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We've been questioning them from the beginning and called deniers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
100% successful of being terribly wrongThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
why do we not reward and listen to teh people who were closer to the truth?!?pic.twitter.com/nIr3Rm0OqH
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.