Sip and learn.https://www.pscp.tv/w/cVc5ETExODgwMjU5fDFncUd2RU92QmduS0IcF9CTRcf2LekTvPp5zJd6cKbKPOkGI1PukhRQ9wRQSw== …
-
-
I'm not fully up on what the wager is, but if net deaths go down, don't we need to partially credit 'stopping' the economy?
-
It is more the stopping of commute People not doing hazardous stuff so much People not getting drunk in bars People not contracting other deadly diseases Additionally: More hygiene More mask wearing after the crisis Incentive to loose weight, eat healthy More telecommute 1/2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You're right. Net deaths is a valuable metric, but if the majority of people don't understand that what would prompt them to unite? Might be a moot point. I think the institutions and people who are capable of developing the tech to fight this have already united.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but will your "net" estimation include increased deaths (e.g. due to suicides related to bad economy) in addition to decreased deaths due to less driving?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, say the virus disappeared at this moment, since the “net” death rate is negative, you would say that the virus gave life. That makes total sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.