The #Coronavirus is acting like an unwelcome Olympics for scientists, doctors, engineers, entrepreneurs, techies, leaders, parents, and ordinary heroes of every kind. Setting records in every event.
-
-
A huge percentage of such a small study is a big deal
-
Whenever I ask anyone how hydroxychloroquine is working, they link to that small French study. STOP! It’s useless. Show me New York from the past week’s use. Or CA with Remdesivir trials.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lol And the uncle of Doc in Back to the Future.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Sorry, Scott, but that’s an unacceptable shortcut. If the data is good enough, a small study is valid, and that is the case here. 78 of 80 patients got better after a 5 day treatment, none of the 78 got pneumonia, COVID patients in general 2-3 week duration 20% pneumonias.
-
Inappropriately small sample size is a portion of the replication crisis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not that this is or isn’t significant, I took chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in Nicaragua (2000) and Afghanistan/middle east (03/04, 06, 07/08) deployments; sometimes dailies or weekly; no malaria or dengue; hope the shit works on this virus. Coffee=good
Aloha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's no such thing as a small study without knowing the effect size
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a researcher, it’s just not that simple. I can show you huge studies that are crap. It’s evaluation of the work w/years of expertise. Which almost no one commenting on the research has.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.