What’s worse, an unusually weak virus that spreads quickly, or a more deadly virus that spreads slowly? Death count could end up the same, but only one spares children. Could China’s “success” be partly because so many already have it undetected? Would they know? #coronavirus
-
-
I think you know better than most
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Italy and Spain data I will trust the most. Waiting to see next week's progress.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
you know about it more then most clowns/pundits on CNN or MSNBC currently commenting on it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, this thing sure makes you appreciate the norm of fully stocked grocery stores, tell ya that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
All the hospitals have canceled elective surgery’s and we are all waiting to see. Hoping the Seattle freeze beats the Italian ciao.pic.twitter.com/hktRmyMMhy
End of conversation
-
-
-
Yes, seems like the UK caught on quickly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can there be another virus that destroys this one but is friendly to humans?
-
No because viruses don’t work that way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.