Must socially separate "healthy" people to stop the spread: People ‘shed’ high levels of coronavirus, study finds, but most are likely not infectious after... https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/09/people-shed-high-levels-of-coronavirus-study-finds-but-most-are-likely-not-infectious-after-recovery-begins/ … via @statnews
-
-
I'm pretty sure we're not going that way but I'm gonna heed your advice as I know 90% of SoCal is made up of hypochondriacs who are already running to emergency rooms demanding COVID19 tests because they have a runny nose. Wife works in a hospital in south bay.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, .3% mortality is only 3x the common flu. Bad, but not even close to Spanish flu mortality. But if it’s more infectious to where treatment can’t keep up with the spread, mortality could go up. And like you said, in that case other ailments get sidelined and not addressed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So few people understand this. The deaths from coronavirus will have to include those that otherwise would have survived with access to healthcare.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Beyond a few precautions that most are doing already, the fear mongering is pathetic. A leader who cancels their message ove a 0.3% death risk doesn’t deserve to be elected.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scarey
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.