Clarification: The words are a direct quote, but taken out of context to change their meaning.
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @erikbryn @AlanDersh
Direct quote out of context to change its meaning. You didn’t actually believe that reporting, did you!
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @erikbryn @AlanDersh
That's the fake version that your news sources brainwashed you into believing. His actual opinion is closer to "If it's good for the nation, it doesn't matter if it is also good for election. That's how the system is designed to work." Literally no one disagrees with that.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @erikbryn @AlanDersh
He has repeatedly said that is NOT his opinion. That would be a stupid argument. (Which should have clued you to it being fake news.) My source is the guy who said it. Your source must be the fake news.
0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @erikbryn @AlanDersh
The context was that the "He only did it for selfish reasons" standard is impossible as a Constitutional standard because it is subjective and involves mind-reading. The Lincoln example demonstrated that point. It was not directly compared to the Trump example.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
No. I'm saying mind-reading is not a practical standard for criminal law or impeachment. We know from Bolton's book and other testimony that Trump expressed repeated concern about Ukraine's past and perhaps future interference in elections. Absent that, you would have a case.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.