Talking about Shampeachment entertainment, Iran’s scary clowns, how to bet on climate change, and coffeehttps://www.pscp.tv/w/cPHDpzExODgwMjU5fDFSREdsTnlnQVdyeEzB0jjg0k7oabuzFQ-4qUkTxgyUxDSyc5hoZkn5_U_MAQ== …
-
-
Yes, it turns out that if you restate the question without any reference to the illegitimate means used to achieve a legitimate end, the impeachable conduct goes away. It's like magic!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You feel that's not an equally biased format? From any perspective, you want to be ok that the president has this authority and positional power to undermine an election? It didn't seem like the result mattered, just that the investigation was taking place. Is that fair?
-
Dems successfully brainwashed the country to think past the sale. The first question is whether it was a legitimate national interest. Democrat’s lawyer said under oath it was. Once that is established, bullying a foreign country to do right is completely acceptable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely.
-
I hope you can see the bias that comes from removing the concern of the president doing this from the question and the fact that if it is a national interest, there are other ways of handling those concerns that don't directly involve the incumbent so close to the election season
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.