Conservatives see more context so they know most of that is fake news. (You still believe the “fine people” hoax?)
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @xanderberkeley
Scott, I think you miss the point with the reaction against Trump's both sides comments about Charlottesville. It is not that it can be argued that Trump has some amount of fact to back him up. It is that he didn't lead with nor emphasize his abhorrence of racism and bigotry.
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Pepe, my personal feelings are immaterial. I was trying to explain why many people reacted so strongly at Trump's Charlottesville press conference. Remember, this guy talks about Mexican rapists, shithole countries, Central Park 5, birtherism, etc. He gets no benefit of doubt.
7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Central Park 5 were guilty, why are you turning rapists into celebrities? You will cheer on rapists just to stick it to trump.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
And so, you defend the Liar-in-Chief who took out a huge ad for the execution of kids who turned out to be innocent of the charges (but were conveniently black). And you spread His lies on the internet for him because he isn’t man enough to A) Speak Truth or B) Admit Fault.
8 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @xanderberkeley @JonFerraiolo
Good example of how artists are bad at reason. The color of the accused was never part of Trump's messaging. Trump agreed with police on who was guilty. Agreeing with law enforcement, yet being wrong, is far from a crime.
4 replies 2 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JonFerraiolo
And your I judgment of artists (which I trust is in jest) is as common as judging people by the color of their skin. And if you think Trump would have called for the heads of 5 white boys you’re either a liar or a fool. Which are you?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @xanderberkeley @JonFerraiolo
You exhibit the mind-reader flaw common to artists who have not had experience in other domains. I'm not jesting (I wrote a book on it, called Loserthink), and there is no evidence Trump would have treated the situation differently based on ethnicity.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JonFerraiolo
I take back my willingness to think you were smart or good. You ate arrogant and toxic , a perfect match for your hero. Go with Him. And we will leave it at that. The Loserthink is yours.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The normal conversation arc with artists on Twitter is that they say something free from reason, others point it out, and then the artist concludes that the messengers are useless pieces of shit. Economists and scientists just figure out where the facts differ.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.