Just brainstorming here, but I wonder if one could build a market around betting on the success (but never the failure) of the hard-to-employ. Let's say I know a recovering addict who would be a good worker but employers disagree. . .
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ghisleb
Why would the agency take a chance on poor workers?
5 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ghisleb
Bingo. Neither will any employer, "agency" or not. Better would be to set the stage for self employment, with that "bond" favoring the customer. Much like business liability insurance.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @Joemora63617406 @ghisleb
The employer would accept because no risk. The surety bond pays. Agency has risk.
1:52 PM - 22 Dec 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.