Just brainstorming here, but I wonder if one could build a market around betting on the success (but never the failure) of the hard-to-employ. Let's say I know a recovering addict who would be a good worker but employers disagree. . .
-
-
Bingo. Neither will any employer, "agency" or not. Better would be to set the stage for self employment, with that "bond" favoring the customer. Much like business liability insurance.
-
The employer would accept because no risk. The surety bond pays. Agency has risk.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If there isn't competitive pressure on agencies, then you can do that, some. Enough failures and out-go exceeds your income. If you have enough failures that your agency is known for iffy employees, you'll have to sweeten the deal somehow so people don't stop using you.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Exactly. The agency isnt certifying. Someone who believes in the worker with good reason is taking the risk and making the investment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.