Just brainstorming here, but I wonder if one could build a market around betting on the success (but never the failure) of the hard-to-employ. Let's say I know a recovering addict who would be a good worker but employers disagree. . .
-
-
Maybe, but it'd be interesting to see what the "headhunter equilibrium fee" would need to be in order to sustain the fund's profitability in an environment riddled of employers moral hazard, specially in early stages of such system where few employers ratings would be available
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, employer has incentive to keep employee due to cost hiring/training/termination HR is an expensive business & not many outside of the field know these hidden costs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Underrated tweet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.