Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Mat‏ @MatHeller1 20 Dec 2019
      Replying to @JoeNBC @ScottAdamsSays

      ‚Carbon neutrality‘ is braindead ideology-speak. MORE CO2 in the air would be better (plant ferfilizer).

      1 reply 4 retweets 12 likes
    2. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @MatHeller1 @JoeNBC

      That’s the worst take on climate. Assumes no upper limit on the goodness.

      7 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
    3. MyDigitalLife‏ @sigtruth 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @MatHeller1 @JoeNBC

      What’s the upper limit on plant life? Are we remotely anywhere near that?

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. Mat‏ @MatHeller1 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @sigtruth @ScottAdamsSays @JoeNBC

      Most agricultural plants evolved in a environment with over 1000 ppm CO2. Currently we are at ~400 ppm. Plants are starving. In your average classroom you have 1000 - 2000 ppm.

      2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
    5. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @MatHeller1 @sigtruth @JoeNBC

      Just out of curiosity, what field of art do you work in?

      2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
    6. Mat‏ @MatHeller1 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @sigtruth @JoeNBC

      IT. You seem not to understand what I'm talking about. What's the problem? Do you know what ppm means?

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    7. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @MatHeller1 @sigtruth @JoeNBC

      I don't do one-variable thinking. I assumed you were an artist of some sort because they are more likely to do so. Everyone knows CO2 is plant food. Scientists agree CO2 raises temperature. One is good, the other, unchecked, could damage the planet. Where's the disagreement?

      5 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
    8. This Tweet is unavailable.
    9. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @RandRoark @MatHeller1 and

      I'm not a scientist. Wouldn't mean anything to me. All we'd know is that most scientists say CO2 causes warming and some are not so sure.

      3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    10. MyDigitalLife‏ @sigtruth 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @RandRoark and

      Errr... I disagree with your framing. One group knows, the other is just confused. It can be said the loudest and most publicized scientists know CO2 causes warming. Others “know” it doesn’t, but they are scientists who know we should always question. Is that fair?

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 21 Dec 2019
      Replying to @sigtruth @RandRoark and

      Neither knows. But one side has the majority weight of science on their side. If we were talking about projection models, I'd be as skeptical as you. But I think scientists have a good grasp on what happens when you add a gas to a system.

      6:19 AM - 21 Dec 2019
      • 4 Likes
      • Bob mr last laugh Kevin Watson PankTendeez, Caveman
      19 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. MyDigitalLife‏ @sigtruth 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @RandRoark @ScottAdamsSays and

          The details of the science may be beyond us however looking at the benefactors surrounding each side helps inform the bias or ultimate outcome. Let’s say alarmist are right. Is it worth living under global control and what history tells us about that or take our chances?

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        3. End of conversation
        1. MyDigitalLife‏ @sigtruth 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @RandRoark and

          I agree we’re basically monkeys howling in a tree. We need to be extremely cautious when science and government partner as much if not more than when religion and government blend.

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. MyDigitalLife‏ @sigtruth 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @RandRoark and

          “adding gas to a system”? Again a framing problem. Our climate is massively complex involving solar cycles, within cycles that span thousands and billions of years and black swan events. Scientific hubris is dangerous.

          0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. ArubaJimy‏ @ArubaJimy 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @sigtruth and

          If scientists have a good grasp of what happens when you add a gas to a system, why do their projections models suck so bad? Scott, I'm a fan, but you can't have it both ways.

          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
        3. MyDigitalLife‏ @sigtruth 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @ArubaJimy @ScottAdamsSays and

          True... they have been getting this climate modeling wrong for over 40 years. (Since the beginning of time and human sacrifices to the sun god... this is just a modern version)

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. Joe Born‏ @JosephHBorn 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @sigtruth and

          "majority weight of science" What scientists say isn't the same thing as science.https://dailycaller.com/2016/04/12/scientist-who-predicted-ny-city-would-be-underwater-says-hes-not-an-alarmist/ …

          0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Wíñchéstër Béår 🐻 🇺🇸︻╦╤─ boop/bop/beep‏ @scorpio8675309 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @sigtruth and

          And all current climate models are not credible. There has been no rise in average global temperatures in almost two decades.

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Bob Johnston‏ @Lunatic__Fringe 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @sigtruth and

          If climastrologists had a good grasp on the science their projections would have a good track record... they're batting 0.000 because they've gone all in on catastrophe and hype. You know this, what is your real game here?

          2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
        3. MyDigitalLife‏ @sigtruth 21 Dec 2019
          Replying to @Lunatic__Fringe @ScottAdamsSays and

          I think Scott has moved on from this topic. He appears comfortable with... A) not being a scientist and not knowing what he’s talking about (his basic words) B) deferring the matter to scientists who he feels have a good grasp of it. Appeal to authority (my words)

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info