‚Carbon neutrality‘ is braindead ideology-speak. MORE CO2 in the air would be better (plant ferfilizer).
-
-
Replying to @MatHeller1 @JoeNBC
That’s the worst take on climate. Assumes no upper limit on the goodness.
7 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
What’s the upper limit on plant life? Are we remotely anywhere near that?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Most agricultural plants evolved in a environment with over 1000 ppm CO2. Currently we are at ~400 ppm. Plants are starving. In your average classroom you have 1000 - 2000 ppm.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Just out of curiosity, what field of art do you work in?
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
IT. You seem not to understand what I'm talking about. What's the problem? Do you know what ppm means?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I don't do one-variable thinking. I assumed you were an artist of some sort because they are more likely to do so. Everyone knows CO2 is plant food. Scientists agree CO2 raises temperature. One is good, the other, unchecked, could damage the planet. Where's the disagreement?
5 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RandRoark @MatHeller1 and
I'm not a scientist. Wouldn't mean anything to me. All we'd know is that most scientists say CO2 causes warming and some are not so sure.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Is your argument that a layperson can easily determine a scientific truth that most top scientists in the field cannot?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @RandRoark and
Want to follow a real scientist; might I suggest
@EcoSenseNow0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.