Anyone wanting to move more quickly towards carbon neutrality, but does not include nuclear energy in their plan, is pushing ideological talking points instead of urgently pursuing that necessary goal. Wind and solar energy alone will not get us there quickly enough.
-
-
Sure. But levels of CO2 can and should be 4x higher. Global Increase in vegetation has untold upside in solving global hunger, economic benefits, biofuels, health, etc. I’m not seeing the alarm?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(I’m not anti-nuclear energy. But like skydiving, it’s the safest sport... until it’s not)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Has anyone ever defined the point where it goes from all plant food to where it's too much and warms the earth?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.