All the evidence supports Trump investigating corruption. No witness has said, afaik, that the 2020 election was on Trumps mind AT ALL, while many agreed that the Biden/burisma connection was suspicious. To call it bribery would make everything we do with aid bribery
-
-
Replying to @Eidotheia @ScottAdamsSays
There is no evidence pointing to “investigating corruption”, let alone “all”. No witness said that bc no one can read his mind. Other testimony, transcripts, and his own public statements support Bribery. No, only those things we do for personal gain are Bribery.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @jazzwind @ScottAdamsSays
You’re reading Trumps mind right now by saying he did it for “personal gain” rather than investigating corruption. All the evidence points to investigating corruption. Every bit.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
The transcripts support Trump investigating corruption. His public statements support investigating corruption. Everything. The only thing Dems were asking about is quid pro quo (or bribery) but it doesn’t matter if the purpose was investigating corruption.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia @ScottAdamsSays
Which transcript? What page? Count how many times he said the word corruption on the call. (Spoiler: 0). If you believe he was “fighting corruption” in one of most corrupt countries around and the only person he asked about was Biden you are hallucinating. Now do Crowdstrike.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jazzwind @ScottAdamsSays
Every transcript, every page relevant to the question, every witness, every testimony. It all boiled down the two things: Trump wanted an investigation into Burisma, and many witnesses agreed the Burisma/Biden connection was suspicious. None said it was about 2020. AFAIK.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Eidotheia @ScottAdamsSays
Since you can’t point to any specific evidence I will accept your surrender. He didn’t want investigations, he wanted the announcement of investigations. Including Crowdstrike, a totally debunked conspiracy theory being pushed by Putin.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jazzwind @ScottAdamsSays
An announcement so they couldn’t back down from the investigation. I did point to the evidence. Every transcript and witness talked about how he wanted an investigation, and many agreed that the connection was suspicious. There is literally nothing that says it was about 2020
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Who cares if it was a conspiracy theory? It’s not wrong to investigate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia @ScottAdamsSays
There is no legitimate corruption purpose to trying to investigate Crowdstrike.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Then it would be a short investigation.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Eidotheia
Crowdstrike breaks your corruption defense that this was about the Corruption Crusader trying to save the world from bad guys. The benefit to Trump was the announcement of the investigation. The length and outcome were irrelevant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jazzwind @ScottAdamsSays
Or, he asked for the announcement so Ukraine couldn’t back out of the investigation. That was the presented reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.