When Dilbert creator Scott Adams supported Trump in 2016, he estimated he lost about 30 percent of his income and 75 percent of his friends. Could the conversation have been different on a more 'civil' internet?https://wired.trib.al/3OTmK9T
-
-
Replying to @WIRED
“The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. It's just easier this way for everyone.” -
@ScottAdamsSays https://jezebel.com/dilbert-creator-deletes-misogynist-rant-5786019/amp …6 replies 2 retweets 72 likes -
That was fake news before we had a term for it. You're a fool for believing Jezebel on anything.
21 replies 17 retweets 295 likes -
Is it fake because you didn't write these words? Fake because you didn't delete it? Or is it "fake" in the same way Trump uses it, which is accurate stories that highlight his lies? The term "fake news" has been around for a while, but Trump has warped it to mean factual news.pic.twitter.com/RtiX9ibH6v
1 reply 0 retweets 24 likes -
Out of context to reverse the meaning. That’s how it is usually done. Then the intentionally absurd interpretation is added as if it came from my mind. Are you new to fake news?
6 replies 3 retweets 77 likes -
Again, I screenshotted a chunk of text you were quoted as writing. If I read the rest of your original post, would that somehow add more context that would reverse the meaning of what's there? Of course, maybe I should just save my energy and not argue with a Trump & MRA advocate
4 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Or easier, ask yourself what you think I intended to say and then ask yourself if that interpretation is even slightly plausible.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Well perhaps if it were a better crafted piece it would be easier to understand your position. Maybe if the entire post wasn’t deleted. Why did you do that again?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Because trolls kept doing what you are doing. Misinterpreting it. Do you have more incredibly stupid questions or just the one?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.