When Dilbert creator Scott Adams supported Trump in 2016, he estimated he lost about 30 percent of his income and 75 percent of his friends. Could the conversation have been different on a more 'civil' internet?https://wired.trib.al/3OTmK9T
-
-
Replying to @WIRED
“Adams blames the current climate on social media and a clickbait business model that rewards sensationalism over fact-based reporting.” Forgive me while I burst out into laughter
@ScottAdamsSays but since when has supporting Trump associated with anything “fact based”?1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Thank you for informing us you laughed at your own hallucination.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @WIRED
Scott, if by civil you mean not hurling explicitives at you then fine. I can be civil. But please spare us this nonsense that says you supporting a serial liar and misogynist
@realDonaldTrump is deserving of some respect. No one owes you anything.2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
Thank you for recommending that I organize my worldview around your batshit crazy hallucinations of reality. Has anyone ever taken your advice and lived?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.