Actually, it's not his job to investigate anyone. What's the point of having law enforcement if he is just going to undermine them?https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1199701592418607106 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Your phony concerns about "the Rule of Law" sailed with Pelosi, Nadler, Schumer, Maxine Waters, Alcee Hastings, Steny Hoyer, John Lewis, Carolyn Maloney, Sheila Jackson Lee and 32 other currently sitting Congress-slime letting Clinton off on his REAL felonies back in 1998.pic.twitter.com/Q7MPyb4Wsq
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s not normal process. DOJ and FBI have procedure and channels for international aspects of investigations. Public announcement of investigations is bad because it allows suspects to coordinate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If not Trump, then who? Is the CIA supposed to pressure Ukraine into compliance? International law enforcement? United Nations? Trump and Trump alone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe certain corporations use this strategy. But there is a big difference between a "corporation" and a country/government with even a fraction of the investigatory tools and power as we have.
-
Not to mention that our state dept and intelligence officials all ageee that corruption is rampant in Ukraine. Having the corrupt investigate corruption doesnt seem like a sound strategy even for corporations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.