While this argument may be correct, it’s too “legalese” for me. More persuasive is: Quid pro quo is perfectly legal when it involves government-to-government actions. Only when there is a personal benefit for a government action does it become illegal. Much simpler.
-
-
Would using the term”probable cause” be persuasive?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Being a one-variable thinker is good when it benefits you, apparently.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.