This is all you need to know.https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1197242429365243904 …
-
2:06 -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @hemultiplyus
This is confusing the issues. Sondland testified clearly that there was a quid pro quo for Ukraine to get meeting with Trump; he just didn't know for sure whether there was a quid pro quo for Ukraine to get military aid. But Mulvaney already said there was. Pay attention sheeple.
6 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @Cornelius_007 @hemultiplyus
The only non-opinion, non-presumption fact in evidence is that Trump said clearly no quid pro quo. Everything else is people imagining.
20 replies 13 retweets 126 likes -
Peter Retweeted Scarlett Rabe 🩸 🦷
Peter added,
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
@ScottAdamsSays liked your tweet. I don’t think he understands it.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Dumb assumption. I like relevant facts. This is relevant.
9:47 AM - 21 Nov 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.