Does seem like important testimony. Also: 1) Mind-reading is not a form of evidence. 2) Inability to imagine other reasons 3) Assuming worst intentions
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So the scroll says "Sondland says there was quid pro quo". Then right above it, Sondland is on screen saying there wasn't. What a world we live in.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is confusing the issues. Sondland testified clearly that there was a quid pro quo for Ukraine to get meeting with Trump; he just didn't know for sure whether there was a quid pro quo for Ukraine to get military aid. But Mulvaney already said there was. Pay attention sheeple.
-
The only non-opinion, non-presumption fact in evidence is that Trump said clearly no quid pro quo. Everything else is people imagining.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
My favorite part is watching the CNN scroll at the bottom saying the opposite of what Sondland is saying. Journalistic integrity is alive and well!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Appropriate advice when the brain cannot hold more than a few seconds of information. I know *yours* can, but then again, you changed after 2016. Here is something you should know: Dilbert cartoon being banned from corporate chatrooms because you symbolize Trump.
-
Yes, I know. Also demonetized on YouTube.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.