When Scott finishes this, can someone provide a summary? Will be interesting to read a summary of Scott's take on Sondland's testimony (which most observers would say went badly for Trump).
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What we're seeing with politics today is like the analog version of spam
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not a sham. Elections have consequences. WE PUT THESE PEOPLE, IN THE HOUSE, to restore checks and balances. It is working well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WRT "Unfair!", this seems like a major persuader for the election, even if it doesn't matter for the facts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Imagine thinking headlines are evidence.
End of conversation
-
-
-
WHITE BOARD Time If ever it was needed, for this confuspeachmentpic.twitter.com/sbJsNtikGA
-
*please
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I appreciate your change in tone from yesterday, your ability to not entrench is admirable. Yesterday you seemed pretty skeptical of any Ukrainian claims but I have to admit that Byron York article is powerful. I think your “do both sides report it” works for a lot of stories but
-
There is a subset of stories that one side won’t report on for one reason or another, and that’s when that shortcut breakdowns. If a story harms a side’s narrative they’ll refuse to even acknowledge it. I feel your trick only works for saying what is true, not what isn’t true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.