Vindman's testimony is that he thought the Ukraine call was "inappropriate" because it might put U.S. bipartisan support of Ukraine at risk. In other words, it was a policy disagreement about risks and priorities. Normal business. #NextHoaxPlease
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Or it was a president using his power for domestic political purposes..
7 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @jccatalini
If we lived in a one variable world, you would be the smartest person in it.
7 replies 3 retweets 52 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jccatalini
With all due respect, your tweet was all about Vindman's testimony being just one thing? That's really inconsistent
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
It’s the thing that makes the other things irrelevant.
12:22 PM - 19 Nov 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
9 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.