What are the "efforts" described in this confusing article? Can someone tell me exactly which Ukraine politician did what to interfere in the 2016 election? ---- Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire https://politi.co/2wbg8F9 via @politico
-
-
Not entirely confident with my own recollection here, but I believe that by January 2016, the investigation into Manafort's activities in Ukraine had already been closed down.
-
Yeah, I think my recollection is accurate here. The Ukrainian investigation into Manafort had been closed by January 2016, but through Chalupa's efforts (still vague on what all she was doing), the so-called "black ledger" had come to be published.https://twitter.com/codyave/status/1126726505495576576 …
0:14
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was a prosecutor (Sytnyk) who leaked the evidence in one of his pending cases, then a Ukrainian parliamentarian had a news conference(Leshchenko). The more important point to me isn't whether this was improper, but the double standards in the "election interference" narratives
-
Remember where the goalposts have gone, since Trump conspiring with Russia to hack was debunked, Dems turned just getting info from overseas into "election interference", IIRC Schiff even said simply meeting was a campaign finance violation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If Trump asking for information on Biden isn’t wrong, neither is asking for info on Manafort. It’s a battle of hypocrites here. Starting point being “getting information from a foreigner about Hillary or Biden violates campaign finance laws” so GOP is throwing it back.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.