Vindman's testimony is that he thought the Ukraine call was "inappropriate" because it might put U.S. bipartisan support of Ukraine at risk. In other words, it was a policy disagreement about risks and priorities. Normal business. #NextHoaxPlease
-
-
Shhh Scott, don't spoil Jason's impeachment fantasy. He hasn't even reached climax yet.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
With all due respect, your tweet was all about Vindman's testimony being just one thing? That's really inconsistent
-
It’s the thing that makes the other things irrelevant.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
btw, if there is only one variable, it is not a variable...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.