The US is a free country, governed by the rule of law. The "spirit of the law" is important. Trump violates the spirit frequently. He TRIES to skirt the law to maximize his influence, but he is certainly no expert. The elephant is real. It is Trump admin+friends breaking laws.
-
-
Replying to @EarthlingNathan @ScottAdamsSays
Trump breaks the "spirit of the law?" To whom did he deny due process, or right to counsel? Did he misrepresent opposition research as intelligence to a foreign intelligence surveillance court, for example? Reality always wins and the Dem elephant is about to roll onto itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Philfile @ScottAdamsSays
Ethics laws, my dude. We have them for a reason. And you can't really tell me Trump doesn't skirt them, or brush up against them, or bend the law as much as he can. The law that slows down his profits are "The Swamp" he attacks. He hates laws that slow down his deals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EarthlingNathan @Philfile
I agree he violates all of the imaginary rules and laws.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Philfile
Exactly. All the elephant-sized ethics laws in the middle of the room that large groups of delusional people refuse to acknowledge: Anarchist-leaning folks, I guess. Social Darwinists. General law-breakers.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Philfile
Every time that Trump has settled out of court, it wasn't because he was innocent.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
These folks see the "elephant". They call it "Trump undermining the rule of law". AND Trump admits it's what he wants to do: Remove regulation. Make unethical deals legal again. Etc. CHALLENGE: Contact them. Influence them of their wrongness. Good luck!https://impeachdonaldtrumpnow.org/who-we-are/legal-advisory-board/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Philfile
It's not my favorite, but a strong example of lawlessness is: "The Mueller report describes several acts that satisfy all of the elements for an obstruction charge" and could "result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice".https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1 …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Except lawyers disagree. Meaning no chance it would ever be prosecuted. If lawyers look at the same facts and can’t even decide if a law has been broken, there is no real risk of prosecution. Nothing but politics.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.