If all you know is one group sees an elephant in the living room, and another group in the same place at the same time does not, what are the odds there is an elephant in the living room? Answer: Hallucinations add to the scenery. They rarely subtract.https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1196250433112727553 …
-
-
Calling removing (or streamlining) regulations "undermining the rule of law" is enough to disqualify them from consideration.
-
I'm not convinced that the regulations and laws Trump is breaking down were bad or wrong in the first place. By definition, they were legal. Do you have a higher order to judge them against? That would be interesting...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's not my favorite, but a strong example of lawlessness is: "The Mueller report describes several acts that satisfy all of the elements for an obstruction charge" and could "result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice".https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1 …
-
Except lawyers disagree. Meaning no chance it would ever be prosecuted. If lawyers look at the same facts and can’t even decide if a law has been broken, there is no real risk of prosecution. Nothing but politics.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.