Name a fact you think is true that I do not. (Watch what happens next.)
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
How would the public benefit by Trumps extortion scheme? Next BS please
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
Would you not want to know if the next president (according to polls) is beholden to a foreign power? I would.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
If that was the case the proper route involves the State Department and the DOJ. You’re just an apologist for lawlessness, corruption and racism and you disgust me.
6 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
So he should be impeached because he kickstarted an investigation for his branch of government? Which crime was that violating?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
The crimes of extortion and bribery. But you can also add obstruction
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
Even the whistleblower didn’t think it was a crime.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
Suddenly the whistleblower is the legal authority.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
Apparently everyone but you knows no crimes are even alleged in this case.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
Dershowitz is in the same racket as you. His opinion is as objective as yours.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think you know there's no law against a president negotiating with another leader to get what the public (and the president) want. You can call it extortion if you like, but that doesn't make negotiating illegal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.