This is the framing that makes most sense. Every conversation between leaders is quid pro quo by its nature, so It is dumb to "look for it." The only salient question is whether the public would benefit by the information the president was requesting. We do. Next hoax, please. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1194214568001724416 …
-
-
More ranting. Zero factual content. You’re rather disappointing as a debater. Run along and count some of your ill gotten gains.
-
Debate is not Mr. Adams game; re-framing to his advantage is what he does. Facts play a secondary role.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.