Name a fact you think is true that I do not. (Watch what happens next.)
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
How would the public benefit by Trumps extortion scheme? Next BS please
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
Would you not want to know if the next president (according to polls) is beholden to a foreign power? I would.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
If that was the case the proper route involves the State Department and the DOJ. You’re just an apologist for lawlessness, corruption and racism and you disgust me.
6 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
So he should be impeached because he kickstarted an investigation for his branch of government? Which crime was that violating?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
The crimes of extortion and bribery. But you can also add obstruction
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
Even the whistleblower didn’t think it was a crime.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
Suddenly the whistleblower is the legal authority.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
Apparently everyone but you knows no crimes are even alleged in this case.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
Apparently not just me. https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Dershowitz (Democrat) says no crimes on the book for this. Obviously all leader conversations are quid pro quo, so "extortion" isn't even a smart take. Even top Dems (many of them lawyers) backed off of this absurd view. Try to keep up. Now it's just "inappropriate."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.