This is the framing that makes most sense. Every conversation between leaders is quid pro quo by its nature, so It is dumb to "look for it." The only salient question is whether the public would benefit by the information the president was requesting. We do. Next hoax, please. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1194214568001724416 …
Apparently everyone but you knows no crimes are even alleged in this case.
-
-
Apparently not just me. https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/ …
-
Dershowitz (Democrat) says no crimes on the book for this. Obviously all leader conversations are quid pro quo, so "extortion" isn't even a smart take. Even top Dems (many of them lawyers) backed off of this absurd view. Try to keep up. Now it's just "inappropriate."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh no! Facts!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m curious now what the articles of impeachment are going to look like.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.