This is the framing that makes most sense. Every conversation between leaders is quid pro quo by its nature, so It is dumb to "look for it." The only salient question is whether the public would benefit by the information the president was requesting. We do. Next hoax, please. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1194214568001724416 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
You’re either an idiot or evil to so willfully distort the facts. It’s possible you could be both.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
Name a fact you think is true that I do not. (Watch what happens next.)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
How would the public benefit by Trumps extortion scheme? Next BS please
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
Would you not want to know if the next president (according to polls) is beholden to a foreign power? I would.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
If that was the case the proper route involves the State Department and the DOJ. You’re just an apologist for lawlessness, corruption and racism and you disgust me.
6 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @LeftMensch @twittsend
So he should be impeached because he kickstarted an investigation for his branch of government? Which crime was that violating?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @twittsend
The crimes of extortion and bribery. But you can also add obstruction
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Oh, the imaginary stuff. No one serious thinks a crime of any sort was committed. That’s why they say quid pro quo instead of crime.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.