This is the framing that makes most sense. Every conversation between leaders is quid pro quo by its nature, so It is dumb to "look for it." The only salient question is whether the public would benefit by the information the president was requesting. We do. Next hoax, please. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1194214568001724416 …
-
-
Yep, need to rely on direct or circumstantial evidence as regards intent. That the allegations might not have passed the sniff test is suggested by the use of his private attorney to end run normal channels through the State and DOJ and request for public announcement.
-
Not so much... this is WSJ reporting, not the standard far-right conspiracy rags. This happened shortly before Joe’s ultimatum. https://www.wsj.com/articles/firm-hired-by-ukraines-burisma-tried-to-use-hunter-biden-as-leverage-documents-show-11573009615 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dimissal and marketing all in four words. Impressive.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.