Nope. Peeing on your supporters trying to bolster your business is not good for business. You effected construction, not design. And no about seconds to react. If that were true, we’d be melting down. You would suggest we’ve made no improvements in 60 years.
-
-
The US Navy has essentially used the same design reactor since the 1960s. They have made minor tweaks to materials and equipment. The fact is that operators have as little 10 seconds to react to casualties in order to prevent damaging the reactor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Nope. Name a reactor that you have contributed to the design. The details and improvements are subtle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I can look at the RPA for the Reactors and can tell you that aren’t designed for 72 hour passive safety or more which is what GEN III offers.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I gave you a soft pitch and you peed on it. Good for you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HallerSpeaks @subschneider and
Your approach to partnering needs help. Scott and Mark are the most transparent influencers for Gen IV Nuclear.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
He is passionate which I can admire.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @subschneider @IAMannabe11e and
Now consider this. The lack of radionuclides for medical imaging is resulting in more deaths than fentanyl. Procedures are not getting done. GEN4 is interesting but we aren’t even getting the basics done.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @subschneider and
Start here. Any search will give you the numbers. We had a large project with U Missouri, but it fell through for tax reasons. (Chalk Creek Canada) was the big source until shut down https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Report-warns-of-medical-isotopes-shortage-in-USA …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don’t see a see a death estimate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.