What does it say about someone that instead of engaging with my arguments he spends multiple tweets trying to debunk the concept of lists! https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1187357114819215360 …
-
-
You quoted from your book: "People who present laundry lists of ten reasons rarely have a strong case." As if the length of my list made it less credible. That's not a mischaracterization of your position. That's a bizarre piece of illogic you presented.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Translation: Scott will use his god-like powers of cherry-picking to claim he’s right and Tom’s wrong. Then dismiss any contrary arguments as irrelevant. Pass the popcorn, this is going to be predictable.
-
The weirdest part of all this is that it doesn't need a translation. He's explicitly said that that's his plan!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think he just likes making lists. I've counted 5 different lists in this TL.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The same problem is faced when debating religious people. They claim to give their best argument, and if/when that first argument is shot down, they start picking from a backup list. A large collection of poor arguments does not equal one large good argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.