Now the Transparent Apologist is saying it's OK that Trump is trashing America because I can still eat Wendy's and watch reality TV. Is there no argument so obviously bullshit that Trump apologists won't say it? Is there any bottom? https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1187330795448356865 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ThomasKaempfen
What’s the best argument in your laundry list?pic.twitter.com/6ApaAPaWwT
3 replies 3 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
So because Trump has harmed America in numerous, multiple ways it means he hasn't harmed America? If he had harmed America even more ways would that make him less destructive? If evidence of guilt in a criminal case is too plentiful does that make the defendant innocent? Huh?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ThomasKaempfen
Give me your one best example/argument for why he is hurting America and after I debunk it, you can rethink the lesser items on your laundry list.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Is there any crack in your armor of illogic? 1. Almost everything on that list is quite destructive 2. Multiple acts of destruction can add up to quite a lot of destruction; it doesn't matter what the worst one is 3. Try and debunk whatever you like; I'm not stopping you
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ThomasKaempfen
You have reached the “smells a trap” stage of this exchange. I accept your suggestion that there are no strong reasons on your list.pic.twitter.com/WeCqIOxr4X
5 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
There's no trap, there's only your bizarre and transparent attempts at game-playing. There are multiple destructive things Trump has done, most of which have genuinely harmed our country. If you could debunk one (go ahead!) that wouldn't change the destructiveness of the others.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ThomasKaempfen
I don't want to waste time on the lower-importance items. Just tell me your one best point and I'll dismantle it for you in public. Watch what happens to your confidence in your opinion after I do.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Kasparov only plays two-dimensional chess. No wonder he has no idea what is going on. (The third dimension is persuasion, which is not his field.)
-
-
If he actually has an "IQ" of 190 we shouldn't expect him to tell the truth. Such a smart chess player would be most likely to say what he thinks will most benefit himself.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.