We know FOR A FACT that Biden ordered Ukraine to fire a prosecutor as a quid pro quo for one billion in U.S. aid. It's on video. We do not know that the prosecutor was corrupt. No facts have been presented. We are told to believe this OPINION. No thank you!
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Cernovich
Correct on both counts. But it is still exculpatory that several other entities accused the prosecutor of being corrupt. That gives Biden the flexibility to be wrong with good company. And wrong isn't illegal in this case. Nor would it be unethical if he believed he was right.
58 replies 10 retweets 103 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @djhelbert @Cernovich
I find that hypothesis credible. It sounds like his other tall tales.
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likes -
Scott, Read the Hill’s article by John Solomon. Has documents from the lawyers of Burisma holding saying the story that he was a corrupt prosecutor was “false information” spread by US representatives.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I find no one credible on the question of how corrupt he was or was not.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Scott, would you find it credible if Hunter Biden’s lawyers for Burisma were the ones on the record saying that he was not corrupt? I would.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I would not. Not even a little.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.