Not what he said (“the Louis Farrakhan of incel white supremacists). And not a statement of fact. So, cannot be a false statement of fact.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Nope. Statement of opinion. What is the empirical, scientific measure of incel white nationalism?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @greggentry1 @73Chluke and
I was just reading this case this morning: https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20190920691 … SPLC called Coral Ridge Ministries a “hate group” and listed them on their website as a “hate group” and told people not to send them money because they were a “hate group.” All opinion.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @greggentry1 @73Chluke and
And you think “the Louis Farrakhan of incel white nationalists” is more of a fact than saying, “this group is a hate group?” Puh-lease!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
“Statements are provable as false when their truth or falsity can be determined based on ‘a core of objective evidence.’ [Milkovich v. Lorain 497 U.S. 1, 19 (1990) at 21] Put differently, the requirement is satisfied if the statement is ‘subject to empirical verification.’”
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @greggentry1 @73Chluke and
“An alleged defamatory statement is generally not provable as false when it labels the plaintiff with a term that has an imprecise and debatable meaning.” Here are some academics who have defined white supremacy: Charles Mills, bell hooks, David Gillborn, Jessie Daniels,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Especially journalists.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.