Thought experiment: If NEW gun purchases with high capacity clips required insurance, the way autos do, would that effectively price most young males out of the market because of risk? We'd still have plenty of weapons, but mostly owned by the safest demographics. Discuss.
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @thenotfakepaul
Because they can. Making things illegal doesn’t make them unattainable. How’s it working for drugs?
2 replies 1 retweet 54 likes -
Replying to @douglaskarr @thenotfakepaul
The goal is to add friction, which works in every domain to lessen behavior, but not all of it, obviously.
18 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Hey Buddy if your so scared your giving up rights or creating “friction” on legal owners rights maybe move to a country that it is illegal to own firearms. China, Russia killed millions of their citizens in the last 100 years. You think that would have happened if they were armed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I’m pro-gun. Go argue with someone who disagrees. It’s more rewarding.
4:59 AM - 15 Sep 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.