Thought experiment: If NEW gun purchases with high capacity clips required insurance, the way autos do, would that effectively price most young males out of the market because of risk? We'd still have plenty of weapons, but mostly owned by the safest demographics. Discuss.
-
-
There is no discrimination in auto insurance. Only past history based on age and gender. Not assumptions of future actions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As many have noted, driving is not a right protected by our Constitution. We must ensure that any restrictions on any of our rights (assuming there should be any at all) are minimal and not under the control of a 3rd party enterprise. Freedom shouldn't be sacrificed for safety.
-
Me buying you a gun is not a right either. Total gun costs include the risk and damage. Why am I subsidizing guns (via healthcare, police, etc.) for people in a high risk group?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.