@ScottAdamsSays This looks like Bill Gates may have good intentions but there may be unintended consequences. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/07/bill-gates-funded-solar-geoengineering-could-help-stop-global-warming.html …
-
-
The problem is politicians and activists never look beyond the positive first order implications of their laws or causes to consider negative consequences & 2nd/3rd order consequences. Using Joel Barker’s Implication Wheel could avoid that.pic.twitter.com/7ujar0P3xX
-
It’s also why people are so blasé about taking a counter full of prescriptions every day, which should scare the crap out of them. Drugs have effects (on your entire body) not “side effects”.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Then if there is a real volcanic explosion we’re doubly damned.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Assuming elite billionaires, essentially world leaders without the title, have good intentions is possibly the highest risk assumption one can make on a global scale. Add in the risk of "unintended consequences" and, for me, too risky. I also have no voice in the matter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hi scott
, what you are saying is true but in systems i believe a good practice involves ensuring that tests are 'reversible' / 'manageable'Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.