@ScottAdamsSays Example of leftists seeking to control others. Freedom to wear a skirt? Unheard of! Is control their ultimate goal? No, just their preferred solution to everything.https://twitter.com/PaulEmbery/status/1169990428759875585 …
-
-
Laws do control and usually for safety. This type of control is something different. Gender neutral is not about safety and goes against basic human nature.
-
It is basic human nature for the sexes to self-segregate. It is almost universal in all cultures that the sexes self-segregate and form their own sub-culture. Same for segregation by age. At least, that's what they taught me in anthropology class in the 70s.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Which is why in a free country there mustn’t be many of them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What make a law good or bad then? Here's my answer: A good law stops violations to anyone's right to self-ownership. A bad law violates someone's right to self-ownership in any way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not the main point of them. Their main point is to achieve a livable society. Control for the sake of it is a very sick thing. But some busybodies really like these laws on the left and the right. In the case of socialism is for some future utopian goal.
-
In the case in point the goal is some sort of gender uniformity that they mistake with equality. A word that today can mean very different things.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is the implication that all laws are valid then? That's silly. Lovers of liberty admire the principle of letting others do as they please, so long as no harm is done. Laws that control others who are not doing harm are too restrictive. Leftists love them anyway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.