I will vote for any Democratic nominee, even Warren or Sanders, despite my profound disagreement with their far-left agenda. Saving American democracy from a mad king matters more than the specific policies of his successor. My @PostOpinions column:https://wapo.st/32fRGRg
-
-
Replying to @MaxBoot @PostOpinions
I would vote for a can of spam if it was the democratic nominee. Yes would march down the street with a sign chanting “Spam! spam! spam!” Say what you like about spam, it never called Neo-Nazis “very fine people”.
327 replies 179 retweets 1,342 likes -
Still spreading the "fine people" hoax>?
@ScottAdamsSays35 replies 13 retweets 292 likes -
Replying to @Thomasdiscerns @vanbadham and
Clearly, Thomas is not the least bit discerning, or intelligent. Hard to believe someone can call something a hoax when it is on video, was seen live by millions and we all know that is exactly what he said.
32 replies 10 retweets 183 likes -
Replying to @HadleeHarris1 @Thomasdiscerns and
Believe it or not, you are experiencing a false memory. You can confirm for yourself by watching the FULL video and FULL transcript, not the hoax versions. Links here:https://bit.ly/2vwqxLD
49 replies 70 retweets 451 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @HadleeHarris1 and
Dude. Trump was referring to the people marching with tiki torches & chanting “You will not Replacement us” -LITERALLY the philosophy name checked by the El Paso shooter! Those were NOT history aficionados - they were NAZIS! GMAFB
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @rosanthony3 @ScottAdamsSays and
What then about where he totally disavowed them?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DailyStuck @ScottAdamsSays and
The point is there were no fine people at that march. Let’s say he was just ignorant the night he made that comment. By now? He KNOWS there were no history buffs at that march. Why hasn’t HE said something? He’s the POTUS! He’s the one w/the largest platform in the world!
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rosanthony3 @DailyStuck and
I interviewed attendees. There were a number of non-racists who were not marching with anyone. This was also confirmed by an audit the city ordered after the fact. Your news sources failed you.
1 reply 2 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @DailyStuck and
Ok. So your ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE outweighs the fact the march was organized by white nationalists
& they chanted slogans from a racist philosophy that a mass murderer later name checked. Got it.
pic.twitter.com/1qubvOAbWm
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
Anecdotal is all we need to verify that some attendees were not with or supporting the racists. I asked them about those flyers. Some locals didn’t see them. Others didn’t recognize the speakers and showed up for their own reasons.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @rosanthony3 and
Those people who were there who were not racists or supporting racists, were at the very least used as useful pawns for the actual racists to pad their numbers and help promote and spread their message, which was the point of the whole shindig.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.