This is like watching a computer play Go with a human. (Guess which one is the computer.)https://twitter.com/business/status/1166950086070304768 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I'm referring to the general case, and as an example of the infinite general cases that people perform.
And I'm not suggesting people are somehow better or more noble than machines. In fact, one could make a case for "humanity" as a defect rather than a feature.
This whole discussion seems like a game of "If I were God..." Assuming we're a Simulation, let's call the Simulator "God." So obviously humans can be created/programmed. Does it then follow that humans can create/program comparable beings?
Hey Scott, How would we know if we created a computer with an internal experience? Is there any way to test for that?
If it is a machine that plays Go, the test would be if it would even bother playing against a human. If it has "internal experience" it would say, "no, you are too easy to beat."
var want = 'cat' if (newWant === 'dog') { want = 'dog' doStuffWith(want) } else if (newWant === 'cat') { want = 'cat' doStuffWith(want) }
In case you didn't read my other comment, I'm not talking about a discrete case. I'm referring to curiosity in the general sense.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.