Talking about systems versus goals, dual loyalty tropes,https://www.pscp.tv/w/cC1GXzExODgwMjU5fDFZcEprdmtFWXBvR2pduoHNg6XZZFqGVsUVaDsD542MMERJHV_KcQBxWGAUPg== …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Scott, here is federalist papers section people were pointing you to. The
#2A is about personal protection AND against tyranny. You are also wrong in that people wouldn’t notice if it was gone. Look at Hong Kong & Venezuela. Lots of ILLEGAL guns are owned by good people worldwidepic.twitter.com/hFcQH3XeBg
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @QuentinBoustany
Is that not based on the obsolete belief an armed populace can match a standing army? The assumption is obsolete, but you keep the thinking anyway?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Recently, we saw a man with an AR hold police to a 4 hour standoff in Philly. 1 man. It’s not about beating an army it’s about resisting. An “insurgency” of millions of Americans matters. Instead of detaining people they would now have to shoot them. Not good optics for any gov.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
If the military turned on citizens, citizens would round up the family members of the military and the government and start shooting them one at a time until the military surrendered. You don't need every kind of weapon to do that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.