And yet the only "official" economic forecasts are for a trivial (not enough to notice) impact over 80 years. That's what the U.N. says. They just word it differently so it sounds scary.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @HeartlandInst
And 80 years is still a small period of time for ClimateChange, but that doesn’t mean we say that relatively small changes are insignificant and irrelevant. Assuming linear progression (it’s not) of sea level rise, seas will be 24 cm higher in 80 years.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EnzoEdmonton @HeartlandInst
That's all included in the economic forecasts that say it will be trivial in the long run (economically). Which means plenty of money to help the people in need.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @HeartlandInst
Yes! I hadn’t thought of that! We can just help the people in need. Like we always do. Just ask the millions of refugees whether they feel they’re being helped. Here’s a thought. Maybe we help people but we ALSO try to reduce emissions and limit warming. Just a thought.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EnzoEdmonton @HeartlandInst
I feel bad destroying your entire identity in public and showing it is based on bad math. And please do ask the millions of refugees who made it to other countries if they are glad they went. They left for reasons.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @HeartlandInst
You’re now worried about my identity? Seriously, dude, you frustrate me that you have a brain and you quickly devolve into the rants of an ignorant internet troll.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EnzoEdmonton @HeartlandInst
Yes, the problem here, that I think is obvious to anyone watching you dissolve in public, is that you have wrapped your identity around a political view that is disproved by math, facts, economics, logic, history, and observation. Now you are flailing.
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @HeartlandInst
Again, with your concern about my identity. I’m flattered. Scott. It’s about the science. It’s about economics. It’s about facts and evidence. You won’t find any of that in
@HeartlandInst or Cato.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EnzoEdmonton @HeartlandInst
Your choice of identity is the cause of your blind spot, as is true for people in general. I await your links to sources showing that poverty has NOT been vastly reduced in the past 80 years to prove your point. Cue the crickets.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @HeartlandInst
My identity is not at issue. Again, thanks for the concern (but it’s getting creepy). As I started out and I clearly stated, there are many metrics that can be used to defend a claim of upcoming riches. Poverty is only one. There are many. My point was that NONE were referenced.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
You are correct that I did not provide evidence for the obvious. And read Win Bigly to learn how your identity blinds you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.