If you don’t have a firm position on climate change and want to read something that is fair to the arguments of both sides, what do you recommend reading? Would be esp great to find something that takes you through issue by issue with responses and rebuttal from different sides.
-
-
Why not take that as an opportunity to compile it yourself and share w/the rest of us?
-
There are threads that Scott created months ago that do this. You can probably find them in the archives - but I can’t help you there. Still don’t know how to do that

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think the book “Meltdown by Patrick Michaels” should be considered. Science based read.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nate Silver's "The Signal and the Noise" makes a legit attempt at this. Best thing I've read on the subject so far.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Roger Pielke Jr and Judith Curry are luke warmists that tell the truth without politics slant. Both academic PhDs
@RogerPielkeJr@curryjaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The problem is that you can't "know" short of getting a PhD in climate science. You are stuck deciding what to believe. My rec is to think not of the climate but of how much liberty are you willing to cede to the govt out of fear? We can be nicer to the planet w/o government.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well said. Following from that, it is the manipulation by fear of its ardent followers. As religion has promised doom for generations, so now does science.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Do not confuse risks with solutions. Those with hammers call everything a nail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.