Talking about “send her back,” Google rigging the election, mining the moon, and delicious coffeehttps://www.pscp.tv/w/cABzDDExODgwMjU5fDF5bktPUnBBWUxPeFIUIsRqrWQVg7X8mXs9-4q9ZrefT-oYYYVWgDxH1v7KHg== …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
On one hand, you say Trump successfully branded Dems as the Fab Four party. On the other hand, you say the Fab Four are wildly successful. Seems like a contradiction, unless getting attention is the sole determinant of success. But it isn't. ???
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Is their "success" measured by anything other than attention?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
I understand. But isn't it only potential success? You've previously explained influence doesn't happen without attention. But does attention guarantee influence, or enough influence to warrant calling it success? As you said, Omar already peaked.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @citizenjeff
Isn't it obviously successful?
12:31 PM - 18 Jul 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.